Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:02:33 +0200 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: libc-test reports * Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> [2015-06-18 14:51:08 -0400]: > Looking at x86 (i386) results for 1.1.10: > > iconv errors are wrong test assumptions; they fail with current musl. fixed > sem_open segfault is probably failure of the test to handle > non-existence of /dev/shm or failure of it to have mode 1777; if so > this is an error in the test environment but it would be nice for the > test to report the error rather than crashing. only sem_open-static.exe fails, so i'm not sure what's the problem (if /dev/shm were broken then the failure of sem_open would be printed) > strtod failures on x86 are expected because of broken emulation. > > remaining math issues I'll leave for nsz. :-) if the test machine is x86 with /dev/kvm then run qemu with --enable-kvm (x87 emulation is too broken otherwise) > fgets-eof-static looks like some linking breakage. It could indicate a > new toolchain bug we're not aware of, so I'd really like to see the > binary that crashes. another weird -static only failure > pthread-robust-detach is a broken test -- it's unstable under fixed > regex-escaped-high-byte failure is odd. It should fail in musl git > without latest libc-test (because of byte-based C locale) but should > not fail on 1.1.10. current libc-test has setlocale(LC_CTYPE, "C.UTF-8");
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.