Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 15:57:23 +0200 From: Shiz <hi@...z.me> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: More on warning cleanup > On 28 May 2015, at 07:08, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote: > > Since compilers differ in what warnings they include in -Wall, I'd > like to remove -Wall (followed by a bunch of -Wno-*) from musl's > --enable-warnings and instead individually turn on the warnings we > want. Sounds like a good idea, if only for consistency between compilers. > One other issue to consider is how to get rid of enabled-by-default > warnings we don't want. On GCC they're impossible to turn off > individually, but unobtrusive; only -w can turn them off, but -w is > permanent and overrides all later -W options. On cparser, a lot of > crap is turned on by default, but -w turns it off and is then > overridable by subsequent -W options. Not sure about clang. clang mimics this behaviour, for what it’s worth. The only thing that will enable warnings again is -pedantic-errors, which is rather unfortunate. I presume GCC behaves the same way. -S Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.