Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 23:48:08 +0200 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com, John Mudd <johnbmudd@...il.com> Subject: Re: Re: musl xclock? * Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> [2015-05-20 23:08:02 +0200]: > * John Mudd <johnbmudd@...il.com> [2015-05-20 16:47:45 -0400]: > > > > It listed this: > > > > libz.so.1 needed by /home/mudd/musl/libXft-2.3.2.install/lib/libXft.so > > found libz.so.1 at //lib/i386-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 > > libc.so.6 needed by //lib/i386-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 > > > > ok so you probably forgot to add libz to the -L path > and then ld went ahead and found the wrong one > i think -L probably wont help: libz is an indirect dependency not listed as -lz on the ld commandline in that case ld searches different set of paths you may want to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH or use -Wl,-rpath-link
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.