Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 19:02:18 +0200 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: musl xclock? * Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> [2015-05-20 19:00:17 +0200]: > libc.so should not be in that dir but libstdc++.so is there > (which has libc.so.6 and ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 dependency among > others) > > if the problem is what i think it is then an empty ld-linux-x86.so.2 > may fix it i meant ld-linux.so.2 (since it is i386 not x86_64)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.