Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 23:41:59 +0800 From: 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: There is no tests for musl, >> > solution, I think there is no one would use >> > wchar_t for cross text processing, cause, on some system, wchar_t is >> > just 8bit width! >> >> anybody would use wchar_t who cares about standard conformant >> implementations. >> >> non-standard broken platforms may get an unmaintained #ifdef >> as usual.. > > I think we (and midipix) have a different perspective from Yonggang > Luo on portable development. Our view is that you write to a POSIX (or > nearly-POSIX) target with fully working Unicode support and fix the > small number of targets (i.e. just Windows) that don't already provide Small is relative, if counting the distribution count, well, Unix wins. > these things. Yonggang Luo's perspective seems to be more of a > traditional Windows approach with #ifdef and lots of OS-specific code, > but just making the Windows branch of the #ifdefs less hideous than it > was before. :) If getting wchar_t to be 32 bit on win32, then truly will be a lot of #ifdef, I am not so sure if you have experience on Win32 API development, I hope we discussing the problems in a more objective way. > > Rich -- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.