Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 20:57:46 -0400 From: Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp@...e.ca> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: perl native musl, ldd On 04/02/2015 05:34 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > * Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp@...e.ca> [2015-04-02 16:40:22 -0400]: >> Using ldd was the best way I found to list one package all >> dependencies (looking at ELF file type ans searching for >> required external components). >> If you have a better way (more standard) to propose not using >> ldd that will be a good thing. idea? > > if you care about the elf dependencies then use the elf standard > > an elf binary will have its dependencies in the dynamic section > (DT_NEEDED entries, you can get them by readelf -d or objdump -p) > > (of course the names there are mapped to paths in an implementation > defined way and will depend on the runtime environment) > Good idea, I tried to use readelf to do this (few month ago) but it was not providing the full path. That's why I decided to use ldd (was in hurry). I need to redo the function using readelf in a smarter way. Thanks. -- A bientôt =========================================================== Jean-Marc Pigeon E-Mail: jmp@...e.ca SAFE Inc. Phone: (514) 493-4280 Clement, 'a kiss solution' to get rid of SPAM (at last) Clement' Home base <"http://www.clement.safe.ca"> =========================================================== Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (3903 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.