Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:02:50 +0100 From: Laurent Bercot <ska-dietlibc@...rnet.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] sha2: new <sha2.h> header I think the main point isn't corner cases, the main point is that those functions (as well-written and useful as they are) are not standardized to be included in a libc, and that would make depending on them nonportable and/or hazardous. I agree with Rich's point: sha2 and other cryptographic functions have their place in a user library, not in a libc. -- Laurent
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.