Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:02:50 +0100
From: Laurent Bercot <>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] sha2: new <sha2.h> header

  I think the main point isn't corner cases, the main point is that
those functions (as well-written and useful as they are) are not
standardized to be included in a libc, and that would make
depending on them nonportable and/or hazardous.

  I agree with Rich's point: sha2 and other cryptographic functions
have their place in a user library, not in a libc.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.