Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:26:10 -0400 From: John Mudd <johnbmudd@...il.com> To: musl <musl@...ts.openwall.com> Cc: John Mudd <johnbmudd@...il.com> Subject: Re: musl 14x slower? I think I found the cause. I added --enable-cassert Postgres option when building Postgres with musl. This makes more sense. On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:53 PM, John Mudd <johnbmudd@...il.com> wrote: > Please cc me on replies. > > I built Postgres with musl. I used version 1.1.0. That works well and I've > been distributing musl Postgres in production. > > I still have an install running a previous build using standard libc from > and old 2.4 kernel build. The "native" build runs 14x faster. And this is > not trying to do anything fancy, just sequentially reading records from a > 400 MB Postgres table. > > native: 0:25 > musl: 5:42 > > I know my musl version is dated but is this slow performance to be > expected? > > John > Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.