Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 07:26:03 -0500 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: realpath() and setfsuid programs On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 09:53:54AM +0200, Timo Teras wrote: > Hi, > > It seems realpath() does not work in binaries using setfsuid(). (At > least on grsec kernels, vanilla kernel might be affected too.) > > The problem is that realpath() opens the file, and then > uses just readlink on /proc/self/fd/<fd> to read the canonicalized > path. > > However, /proc/self/fd is not accessible if setfsuid() has been used to > drop privileges. > > The problem I'm looking at in this case is fuse. fusermount, the > suid wrapper to do user fuse mounts, seems to basically do: > oldfsuid = setfsuid(getuid()) > oldfsgid = setfsgid(getgid()) > take realpath of mountpoint > chdir("/") > setfsuid(oldfsuid) > setfsgid(oldfsgid) > > I believe they want to drop privileges so it works as also access check > to the mount point directory. As realpath() in practice checks that the > user has access to the entry too. Could you clarify what you think the security intent of this code is? As far as I can tell it's nonsense. realpath is not usable for much of anything security-related; in particular, it's non-atomic and subject to all sorts of trickery involving renaming/moving directories during its operation, even moreso when it's done component-by-component in userspace. Why is the check not simply an ownership check for the mount point? I suspect it has to do with the need to pass a pathname rather than fd to mount, which is subject to renaming/moving races, but the realpath call would be subject to the same and worse. Presumably the correct way to do this is to open a fd to the mountpoint then pass /proc/self/fd/%d to the mount function after checking ownership. > This works glibc, as realpath() canonicalizes the path > component-by-component in userland. But musl breaks due to the /proc > not being accessible while privileges dropped. > > Any suggestions? I think first we should figure out if the code even makes sense. I suspect it's a bug. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.