[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141106194701.GO10829@port70.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 20:47:02 +0100
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Compiling openssl static with musl
* Tim Tassonis <stuff@...entral.ch> [2014-11-06 19:30:31 +0100]:
>
> I just managed to compile an openssl (openssl-1.0.1i) static binary on
> 64 bit linux which works fine, it seems.
>
good
> However, it was quite a PITA, as openssl always wanted to link against
> -ldl and always ignored my "-static" whichever way i tried to provide it.
>
-ldl should not be a problem with musl
(it has an empty libdl.a)
> I only got successful after I patched openssl's Configure to add the
> following line after line 363:
>
> "linux-x86_64-musl", "gcc:-m64 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3
> -Wall::-D_REENTRANT::-static:SIXTY_FOUR_BIT_LONG RC4_CHUNK DES_INT
> DES_UNROLL:${x86_64_asm}:elf:dlfcn:linux-shared:-fPIC:-m64:.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR):::64",
>
> and then called
>
> ./Configure --prefix=$PFX --openssldir=/etc/ssl no-hw zlib no-engines
> no-dso no-threads linux-x86_64-musl
>
unfortunately you have to work around their build system
(for musl it would be enough if they used standard interfaces instead
of doing several layers of incorrect configurations and ifdefs)
>
> Did I miss something or might this be something to document somewhere or
> maybe even forward to the openssl people?
>
you should report openssl build system bugs to openssl, there are plenty
of open ones, eg you could bump these:
https://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2823&user=guest&pass=guest
https://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3526&user=guest&pass=guest
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
