Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 10:54:24 -0400
From: Rich Felker <>
Subject: Re: printf() less __assert_fail()

On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 04:45:44PM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> It makes no sense to use printf() in this function. Is this a good idea?

I'm not sure why it "makes no sense". There are a few minor
differences in behavior with your version, the main ones I see being
that yours is non-atomic but async-signal-safe. Are there major
reasons you want to change it?


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.