Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:38:58 +0200 From: u-igbb@...ey.se To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: compiling musl with pcc (i486-pc-linux-gnu) (was: compiling musl on x86_64 linux with pcc) On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:46:17AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > I have pcc 1.1.0.DEVEL 20130227 with pcc-libs-20130721 and it seems to > still work fine with current musl. Note that some fixes are needed for I have got a musl instance compiled with pcc which seems to be usable. A pcc compiled and linked against it reproduces itself and then reproduces the same code for musl. The catch: Using --enable-optimize=no leads to a broken library (at least concerning the variadic arguments). > I just ran libc-test with libc.so built by pcc and confirmed that > there are no non-math regressions versus gcc-built libc.so. (I did not > check math in detail because there are lots of known math failures > that are not serious.) Now we know that this is possible with the current version as well, but not without optimization :) Regards, Rune
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.