Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:11:25 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...udius-systems.com> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] implement glibc's glob_pattern_p On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 02:29:59PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > > they seem to have copied a lot of code from musl, but > > never said a word about it here.. would be nice to know > > where they are going with it.. or why they decided to > > use musl in the first place > > > > I am sorry about that! The decision to use musl was a very early No need to be sorry. I think nsz just wanted to alert you that there might be serious bugs that should be fixed if you're going to continue to use a fork. The WHATSNEW file does a pretty good job of summarizing important fixes in each release and could be used to find patches to backport. If your fork is pre-1.0, I would follow the 1.0.x series WHATSNEW file as long as that branch is maintained since you'll have a lot less non-bugfix items to sift through than with the 1.1.x series which has lots of new development in addition to bug fixes. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.