Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:24:42 +0200 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: Weiming Zhao <weimingz@...eaurora.org> Cc: 'Rich Felker' <dalias@...c.org>, musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: AArch64 merge back * Weiming Zhao <weimingz@...eaurora.org> [2014-07-15 13:42:11 -0700]: > In the beginning of aarch64/bits/syscall.h, we can see comments like: > > It looks like it's coming from some other projects. > Could you help to confirm its source? The reason is we plan to use MUSL for > some internal projects but we need to make sure there is no legal/license > issues. this is just include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h from the linux kernel and it should be cleaned up because it's full of noise (musl only needs the __NR_ and SYS_ macros) > For musl-or1k, there is no aarch64 version of syscall. Are you suggesting > that we can refer to its ARM version of syscall.h? all the new archs (like aarch64 and or1k) use the same asm-generic/unistd.h for the syscall numbers so they should have identical syscall.h in musl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.