[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140713205859.GA25416@openwall.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 00:58:59 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Mutt group reply
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 07:59:04PM +0100, Laurent Bercot wrote:
> On 13/07/2014 17:34, Solar Designer wrote:
>
> >An alternative is to reconfigure the list so that it doesn't set the
> >Reply-To header, but this may result in many replies being inadvertently
> >sent off-list. I think it's better for Mutt users to adopt a habit to
> >answer that question with "n".
>
> Even better: configure Mutt to use Mail-Followup-To.
> http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html
>
> Mutt supports it, it just needs to be configured via an option. I can't
> remember the details because it's been a long time, but back when I was
> using Mutt, I did that for all the mailing-lists I was subscribed to, and
> it worked flawlessly.
This suggestion keeps coming up, but I think it's a solution to a
different problem. The mailing list sets Reply-To to keep discussions
on the list regardless of what MUA people are using. When the mailing
list is configured that way, Mutt exhibits the behavior with group
replies that I have mentioned, and the workaround is either to answer
"n" to the question or to set the reply_to option differently:
reply_to
Type: quadoption
Default: ask-yes
If set, Mutt will ask you if you want to use the address listed
in the Reply-To: header field when replying to a message. If
you answer no, it will use the address in the From: header field
instead. This option is useful for reading a mailing list that
sets the Reply-To: header field to the list address and you want
to send a private message to the author of a message.
This problem and the workaround apply even if the mailing list in
question is configured in Mutt as such, in which case Mutt would set
Mail-Followup-To on your messages, but that's irrelevant.
If I understand correctly, Mail-Followup-To reduces occurrences of
duplicate replies to you, but it does not prevent missed group replies
from you to off-list message senders when the list sets Reply-To.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
