Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 23:25:46 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: glfw - x11 and opengl On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 09:40:10PM -0500, Samuel Holland wrote: > On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 01:14 +0100, Laurent Bercot wrote: > > On 03/07/2014 22:22, Carlos Breviglieri wrote: > > > I also keep an eye on aboriginal linux for other architectures testings, > > > which, just now, announced basic musl compatibility... sweet. > > > > Where did you see that announcement ? I can see nothing on landley.net. > > I've been waiting for the Aboriginal native musl toolchains for a while > > and chafing at the bit. It would be sweet if they were finally ready. > > (Rob, can you confirm/deny ?) > > > > http://lists.landley.net/pipermail/aboriginal-landley.net/2014-July/001399.html Has anyone had a chance to look at this yet? It would be nice if someone with experience with distros/building could help check for common breakage/pitfalls. I know Aboriginal is using a much older toolchain than most musl users, so that might also have some new issues that others haven't encountered. I suspect there might still be issues with libgcc.a symbol visibility that would result in broken binaries when dynamic linking against musl; this should be easy to check. BTW regarding the libgcc.a issue, since it seems to be common in bootstrapping, it might be worth working around it in the musl build process by using -Wl,--exclude-libs,libgcc.a if this option is supported by the linker. Anyway back to the point, it's great to see musl making it into Aboriginal! Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.