[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 17:00:39 +0200
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: checks involving LDBL_MANT_DIG
* writeonce@...ipix.org <writeonce@...ipix.org> [2014-05-27 07:23:20 -0700]:
> In src/complex/*, several files check for LDBL_MANT_DIG == 53 &&
> LDBL_MAX_EXP == 1024, however according to src/stdio/vfprintf.c,
> (LDBL_MANT_DIG == 53) is considered incorrect and would cause a
> compile-time error. Does this mean that the above checks in
> src/complex/* may be eliminated?
there is nothing wrong with LDBL_MANT_DIG == 53
vfprintf only checks if long double really has appropriate size in that case
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
