Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 02:01:03 +0100 From: Laurent Bercot <ska-dietlibc@...rnet.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Post-1.1.1 plans > There may be other open things I'm missing; let me know if you have a > request that doesn't appear above. I would like to have a serious design discussion about how to implement leap second support in musl. I haven't taken the time to have a serious go at it since I first mentioned it, but I have thought about it for a bit and it is indeed more complex than it appears - because the standard way of supporting them, i.e. in timezone files, is broken. (Timezones are a process-wide setting since the default can be overriden with TZ, but interpretation of the system clock as a TAI or UTC clock should be a system-wide setting.) So, before diving in and writing some more code that won't be merged in, I'd like to assess exactly what would be acceptable for musl and what would not. A probable spin-off of this discussion is a subject in itself: what would be an acceptable format, a set of conventions to follow, to add musl-specific extensions outside of POSIX (or whatever superset of POSIX musl implements). -- Laurent
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.