Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 10:26:46 +0100 From: Laurent Bercot <ska-dietlibc@...rnet.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: Resolver overhaul concepts On 10/05/2014 03:36, Rich Felker wrote: > doesn't let you do anything you can't already do with AF_INET and > udp. Nit: it does. (User authentication, fd passing.) But I agree that this is not needed for name resolution and would gratuitously add muslisms. -- Laurent
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.