Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 20:45:05 +0200
From: Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@...ia.fr>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add definition of max_align_t to stddef.h

Hello,

Am Donnerstag, den 08.05.2014, 13:41 -0400 schrieb Rich Felker:
> BTW in your above example, it's not even clear to me if that use of
> alignas is valid.

Besides the question of such a thing makes sense or noŇ£ with the
current version of the standard it isn't syntactically valid. alignas
can't be applied to struct fields. So for the moment the whole
discussion in the standard about types with extended alignment is
pointless.

This issue has been raised as a defect report, and it seems that the
committee agrees to change this in a corrigendum.

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/dr_444.htm

Jens

-- 
:: INRIA Nancy Grand Est :: http://www.loria.fr/~gustedt/   ::
:: AlGorille ::::::::::::::: office Nancy : +33 383593090   ::
:: ICube :::::::::::::: office Strasbourg : +33 368854536   ::
:: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: gsm France : +33 651400183   ::
:: :::::::::::::::::::: gsm international : +49 15737185122 ::



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.