[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 20:45:05 +0200
From: Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@...ia.fr>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add definition of max_align_t to stddef.h
Hello,
Am Donnerstag, den 08.05.2014, 13:41 -0400 schrieb Rich Felker:
> BTW in your above example, it's not even clear to me if that use of
> alignas is valid.
Besides the question of such a thing makes sense or noţ with the
current version of the standard it isn't syntactically valid. alignas
can't be applied to struct fields. So for the moment the whole
discussion in the standard about types with extended alignment is
pointless.
This issue has been raised as a defect report, and it seems that the
committee agrees to change this in a corrigendum.
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/dr_444.htm
Jens
--
:: INRIA Nancy Grand Est :: http://www.loria.fr/~gustedt/ ::
:: AlGorille ::::::::::::::: office Nancy : +33 383593090 ::
:: ICube :::::::::::::: office Strasbourg : +33 368854536 ::
:: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: gsm France : +33 651400183 ::
:: :::::::::::::::::::: gsm international : +49 15737185122 ::
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
