[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140507130443.72c74f47@vostro>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 13:04:43 +0300
From: Timo Teras <timo.teras@....fi>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: scjthm@...e.com
Subject: Re: Linking musl with ld.gold
On Wed, 7 May 2014 10:04:24 +0100
Stephen Thomas <scjthm@...e.com> wrote:
> > only the object files with referenced symbols are linked from an
> > archive
> >
> > so only a.o with the given main.o because of the symbol f
> >
> > now if you make some reference in main.c such that b.o should
> > be included but main still returns 0 that would be a bug
> >
> > eg. add a void g(void){} to b.c and call it from main.c
>
> Ok, thanks for that info. It appears that there is a problem in gcc
> 4.9 and not 4.8.3.
Is perhaps -ffunction-sections and/or -fdata-sections added
automatically? Those would break musl like experienced.
- Timo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
