Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 10:21:55 +0200
From: Szabolcs Nagy <>
Subject: Re: static musl-based gdb and -fPIC

* Szabolcs Nagy <> [2014-04-21 09:33:47 +0200]:
> yes they define posix_ prefixed symbols for internal use
> which are reserved names for the c implementation when
> any standard headers are included
> the next posix standard defines posix_close so this is a
> real collision (and will be an issue with every conformant
> libc), but all the other posix_ symbols are wrong there too

it seems it was already reported and "fixed"

the fix is broken though

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.