Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:51:48 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Preparing for releases 1.1.0 and 1.0.1 On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:48:13AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:17:00AM -0400, Morten Welinder wrote: > > > Yes but this leads to serious breakage if the compiler does not handle > > > the request to drop precision in a conforming way, and it still > > > doesn't help the fact that strtod depends on long double semantics. > > > > Are you sure? > > > > If the incoming number has at most 53 bits then there will be at most > > 24 bits left after the 2^(1+28) reduction. The scalings by 10^9 = 2^9 * 5^9 > > require at most log2(5^9) ~ 21 extra bits. > > > > That ought to fit in valgrind's double. > > Are you basing this on a reading of how long double is used in the > source file, or just generalities? The rounding logic depends on > exactly how many places are kept/dropped when a certain addition is > performed. Maybe we're unclear on what one another are saying. I'm talking about strtod and family here, not printf. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.