Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:10:14 +0200 From: Waldemar Brodkorb <mail@...demar-brodkorb.de> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: automatic musl-test Hi, Szabolcs Nagy wrote, > * Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> [2014-04-09 22:36:53 +0200]: > > > * Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> [2014-04-09 22:16:24 +0200]: > > > * Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@...nadk.org> [2014-04-09 17:07:59 +0200]: > > > > A report generated from today, is here: > > > > http://openadk.org/musl-test/ > > > > > > > > > > hm something is wrong with the i686-git float tests > > > > > > > can you send me some test binaries built by your toolchain? > > > > ok i downloaded the adk-test-framework and the i686 > root fs has glibc in it.. Sure, the base system is glibc. > that explains all the errors :) > > may be you should report the bugs to glibc.. > > (i knew about several fp errors in glibc but i never had > a recent enough glibc to test them) Hmm, but the libc-test is compiled with musl libc via a special specs file. So no glibc code involved while executing the test binaries. $ readelf -a libc-test/src/math/fenv.exe|grep interpreter [Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-musl-i686.so.1] Upps, and here we see, that the wrong interpreter is linked into the binary. I fixed it. Get a new REPORT. best regards Waldemar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.