Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 18:17:47 +0100 From: Laurent Bercot <ska-dietlibc@...rnet.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: MUSL_LIBRARY_PATH ? On 06/04/2014 17:18, Rich Felker wrote: > The obvious workaround is to put a shell script in place of your > actual binary, and have it do: > > exec "$ldso" -- "foo.bin" "$@" > > or similar. Alternatively a minimal static-linked binary could be used > instead of shell script to make it perform better and eliminate some > of the risks of shell script processing. Shameless plug: this is the perfect use case for execline. http://skarnet.org/software/execline/ An execline script will perform better here than a shell script, without the risks, and still offer the editability of a script. -- Laurent
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.