Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 08:23:24 -0700 From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: vDSO parsing bug? Hi- It looks like musl can't handle vDSO images with more than one PT_LOAD segment. Both glibc and the reference code in Documentation/vDSO/parse_vdso.c can handle this. It's not currently an issue, since I don't think that any architectures provide such a vDSO, but they might want to in the future. Also, using the name "linux-gate.so.1" is sort of wrong on x86_64, where the convention is "linux-vdso.so.1". Wouldn't it be better to just read the name out of the SONAME header? --Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.