Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 19:28:05 +0100 From: Thomas Kreuzer <tmkreuzer@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Last call for bugfixes for 1.0 On 16.03.2014 16:25, Rich Felker wrote: > Have you done analysis to determine that this has anything to do with > musl's fgetln function? Short of that, I suspect it's just an ordinary > crash in your fgetln. There's no reason they should be interfering; > for static linking, if fgetln is already defined then musl's fgetln.o > won't even get linked, and for dynamic linking, your symbol overrides > and nothing else accesses musl's fgetln symbol As I said, if I just rename the function it works perfectly. But it doesn't seem to be a problem of musl either. Sorry for making the wrong call, the problem must be somewhere else in my tool chain regards
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.