Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:47:05 +0100
From: Daniel Cegiełka <>
Subject: Re: Re: Removing sbrk and brk

2014-02-21 17:36 GMT+01:00 Szabolcs Nagy <>:
> * Daniel Cegie?ka <> [2014-02-21 17:03:36 +0100]:
>> And what do we do with failures when sbrk is used?
> most of these only call sbrk(0) which is supported

ok, thank you for the information.

> the "old musl" did not support sbrk either (the cited code uses it
> with malloc), the "new musl" just helps you find the bug more easily

ex/vi doesn't work with the new musl. Too bad, because it is the
traditional unix ex/vi. Maybe Gunnar Ritter still fixes bugs.

best regards,

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.