Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:47:05 +0100 From: Daniel Cegiełka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: Removing sbrk and brk 2014-02-21 17:36 GMT+01:00 Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>: > * Daniel Cegie?ka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com> [2014-02-21 17:03:36 +0100]: >> And what do we do with failures when sbrk is used? >> > > most of these only call sbrk(0) which is supported ok, thank you for the information. >> http://ex-vi.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ex-vi/ex-vi/ex_subr.c?revision=1.8&view=markup >> > > the "old musl" did not support sbrk either (the cited code uses it > with malloc), the "new musl" just helps you find the bug more easily ex/vi doesn't work with the new musl. Too bad, because it is the traditional unix ex/vi. Maybe Gunnar Ritter still fixes bugs. best regards, Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.