Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 20:35:50 -0600 From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: libgcc --disable-shared test case On 01/11/14 17:55, John Spencer wrote: > Rich Felker wrote: >> The way to fix it is to find the conditional logic in the gcc build >> system (I forget whether it's in configure, the Makefiles, or the >> headers) that disables use of the visibility attribute when >> --disable-shared is passed, and simply dummy it out so that visibility >> is always used. At one point we discussed on IRC how this could be >> fixed at the GCC level, so I could probably dig something out of IRC >> logs if you want. > > that would be > https://github.com/sabotage-linux/sabotage/blob/36661440192e2ec51531ea81c7866578010f3283/KEEP/gcc-454-libgcc_hidden.patch In 4.2 there is no libgcc/Makefile.in, instead there's a mklibgcc.in generating the file. Given that it's generating a value and assigning it to vis_hide a few lines earlier, I have no idea if the suggested fix (trying to pass through a value from autoconf?) is relevant to this version of the code. The real problem is I have no way to reproduce the failure yet. The comment that it occurs building musl for mips seems useful, I'll try that. But it's kinda hard to fix a failure I've never seen fail... Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.