Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 20:32:17 -0500 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: optional compat? On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 11:11:45PM +0000, Justin Cormack wrote: > The include files sys/errno.h and sys/signal.h, to work around broken > code are a bit inconsistent, one has a #warning and the other doesnt. > I would actually rather that they were only installed if requested, as > (in an unusual situation) they are actually causing me issues. It > would seem nicer to have a make installbroken as well... Could you elaborate on how they're causing a problem? It's preferred to avoid creating multiple configuration variants which would then need to have their own application compatibility studies... Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.