Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:01:35 -0500 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Release test framework On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 01:51:42PM +0800, 邓尧 wrote: > If busybox is used, the test framework itself would depend on musl-libc, > which means test test framework would depend on the test subject. In > theory, it's a bad bad idea. > > 0.02$ The busybox used need not even be linked with musl; it could be a uclibc-linked binary from aboriginal, for example. The point was not to use busybox as any major part of the test framework, just to have a shell to run the script that would run all the tests from the libc-test package inside qemu. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.