Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 03:48:21 +0100 From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@...too.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Feature request On 29/10/13 03:33, Rich Felker wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 08:13:09PM +0000, Paul Schutte wrote: >> Hi Guys, >> >> Would it be possible for you to add the version of musl to the output of >> libc.so ? >> >> root@...otage:~# /lib/libc.so >> musl libc/dynamic program loader >> usage: /lib/libc.so pathname [args] >> >> I have several machines with musl on it and it will be very helpful to see >> which version is installed. > > Indeed, this has been something I've wanted to add for a while, and > which should definitely be in for 1.0. It's just a matter of doing the > right thing in the build and release system to get the version in > there, and it's not clear what the version should read for git builds > between versions. I think this is a good chance to discuss that. git describe short signature might be the best option. lu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.