Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:27:58 +0600 From: agent <agentprog@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: ELLCC has self hosted. 21.10.2013 03:05, Rob Landley пишет: > I'd cc: the relevant parties but this mailing list is misconfigured > with the broken reply-to: tag so I'd have to dig through the > backscroll to find out who they are. Oh well. > > On 10/20/2013 11:49:59 AM, agent wrote: >> 19.10.2013 05:02, Richard Pennington ?????: >>> The clang/LLVM based ELLCC project (http://ellcc.org), after having >>> reached a huge milestone (http://ellcc.org/blog/?p=231) has now >>> successfully compiled itself. >>> >>> The steps were: >>> 1. Use gcc to build the compiler with Linux standard libraries. >>> 2. Use ecc to build itself with libc++, libc++ABI, libunwind, musl, >>> and compiler-rt >>> 3. Use the newly built compiler to build itself again. > ... >>> >>> That is very cool. >>> >>> -Rich >>> >> >> I understand my question is rather stupid, but what is the most >> preferable way to >> use ecc as a compiler to build itself? Even if I set cc and cxx >> variables in the >> root configure script, it still builds everything with gcc. Is >> setting CC and CXX >> environment variables sufficient? >> >> Dmitry > > My question is even dumber: why does the ellcc.org download page say > the last release was a year ago? > > Rob > There are only binaries on a download page and I don't believe binary downloads pages any more, so I checked out from SVN repository. I confirm it is able to compile C and C++ code and link it statically with musl libc and clang libc++, but I have this trouble with using it to recompile itself. It compiles about 2 hours on my box so it is quite hard to experiment with environment variables just to find out it was still built with GCC. Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.