Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 11:29:57 -0400 From: Gregor Richards <gr@...due.edu> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl 0.9.12?] Here are the results from my latest build of NetBSD pkgsrc 2013Q2 on musl 0.9.12, with patches from http://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches revision 999f342e0633. Attempted: 11274 Deps failed: 3336 Build tried: 7938 Build failed: 919 Tests failed: 1811 Success: 5208 (65.6085%) Breakdown: http://musl.codu.org/pkgsrc-results/pkgsrc-results-2013Q2-999f342e0633-musl-0.9.12-breakdown.txt?attredirects=0&d=1 or http://wiki.musl-libc.org/pkgsrc_results (once the wiki is working and I can update it) Archive: http://musl.codu.org/pkgsrc-results/pkgsrc-results-2013Q2-999f342e0633-musl-0.9.12.tar.gz?attredirects=0&d=1 Notes: In the breakdown, 'D' means dependencies, 'B' means build, 'T' means tests. Blank is success, 'X' is failure. Yes, I know musl 0.9.13 is already out. It took me a while to run these, OK! Perl had strange problems this time 'round. Didn't seem to be related to musl though. This particularly influenced tests for all Perl packages, bringing down the overall success rate artificially. If you have patches to make other packages build, please report them on the musl-pkgsrc-patches issue tracker: https://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches/issues . As with all of my repositories, musl-pkgsrc-patches is also available via git: http://github.com/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches . If you reply to this email, please reply-all. I am not presently subscribed to this mailing list, as it has no digest option. With valediction, - Gregor Richards
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.