Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 21:16:21 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Build system adjustments for subarchs On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 09:06:17PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > Another idea, using the filesystem, would be to have .sub files in the > asm directories containing the filename of a different asm file to > substitute. This is essentially emulating symlinks, but I don't see a > good way to get make to do automated dependency tracking so that > modifying the pointed-to asm file causes the object file to be > rebuilt. I am exploring this approach further however in hopes that > there might be a way. > > Any other ideas? One further idea I sort of like: -include arch/$(ARCH)/subarchs.mak and coming up with a halfway-clean way, in subarchs.mak, to put rules that override the asm files that get used for particular modules. However, I'm not seeing a really clean way to do that. I don't want to end up duplicating the commands for assembling into files other than the main makefile. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.