Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 10:51:58 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: problems with dynamic linking since 0.9.1 On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 04:49:55PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > * Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> [2013-08-14 10:27:10 -0400]: > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:06:29AM +0200, Jens wrote: > > > bash-4.1# ld -V > > > GNU ld version 2.17 > > > Supported emulations: > > > elf_x86_64 > > > elf_i386 > > > i386linux > > > > > > Hope this helps. > > > > Thanks. I don't see anything obviously wrong in the trace or verbose > > output. Unless /lib is where you have musl installed (which doesn't > > seem to be the case, the -L /lib/. probably should not be there, but > > it doesn't seem related to the problem. Have you run the file command > > and/or readelf -a on libc.so as a sanity check? Perhaps something > > about the toolchain or existing wrapper messed up the link of libc.so. > > > > wasn't there an issue that the last gplv2 binutils version > failed to produce a working libc.so with -Bsymbolic-functions? My recollection was that it failed to support -Bsymbolic-functions at all and would produce an error when encountering it, so this makes me wonder how generation of libc.so succeeded at all... Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.