Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:48:49 +0200 From: Gregor Pintar <grpintar@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: musl 0.9.12 released 2013/7/30, idunham@...abit.com <idunham@...abit.com>: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:14:34PM +0200, Gregor Pintar wrote: >> 2013/7/29, Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>: >> > * Gregor Pintar <grpintar@...il.com> [2013-07-29 19:37:19 +0200]: >> >> >> >> I have a problem. When I try to compile it, I get this: >> >> >> > >> > are you sure the x86_64 arch is correct? >> > >> > seems gcc does not know about x86_64 registers in the asm >> > >> > i'd check the target in gcc -v >> >> Yes, x86_64 is correct arch. Target is also correct. >> "as crt1.s" also works. It's probably something wrong with gcc. > > Maybe see what happens if you pass a flag that forces binutils to use > 64-bit mode (--64 is documented in the as man page)? > > It looked to me like gcc generated 64-bit code, then invoked as > in 32-bit mode. > > HTH, > Isaac Dunham > I switched distribution yesterday. I had similar problem when compiling kernel (it wanted gnu/stubs-32.h). It was definitely something messed up with gcc. Now it works.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.