[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:38:08 -0500
From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: New "portable" crt1.c
On 07/18/2013 09:17:26 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> I'm open to comments, but my feeling is that we should keep the
> existing crt asm for archs where it already exists, but replace the
> empty crt1.c with a version based on this approach, and encourage
> using the new approach on all new ports. In the future, if maintaining
> the current asm becomes a burden (e.g. if new requirements are
> introduced) we could remove the existing asm and switch to the C for
> all ports.
The wiki page on porting to new architectures needs some updating. :)
> Rich
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
