Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:38:08 -0500 From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: New "portable" crt1.c On 07/18/2013 09:17:26 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > I'm open to comments, but my feeling is that we should keep the > existing crt asm for archs where it already exists, but replace the > empty crt1.c with a version based on this approach, and encourage > using the new approach on all new ports. In the future, if maintaining > the current asm becomes a burden (e.g. if new requirements are > introduced) we could remove the existing asm and switch to the C for > all ports. The wiki page on porting to new architectures needs some updating. :) > Rich Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.