Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:49:55 -0500
From: Strake <strake888@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: embedded newbies site.

On 16/07/2013, LM <lmemsm@...il.com> wrote:
> Sites like suckless.org state what they consider are better and worse software choices.
> Would be nice to see some actual statistics and rationale backing up what is considered better or worse design.

No statistics, but they surely have rationale: http://suckless.org/sucks

> Musl's useful not just for embedded systems but for older machines that
> want to run efficient desktop environments.  However, what works for a
> desktop environment might not work well for an embedded system and so on.

True, but small code wins everywhere, for it fits more easily in cache.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.