Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:49:55 -0500 From: Strake <strake888@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: embedded newbies site. On 16/07/2013, LM <lmemsm@...il.com> wrote: > Sites like suckless.org state what they consider are better and worse software choices. > Would be nice to see some actual statistics and rationale backing up what is considered better or worse design. No statistics, but they surely have rationale: http://suckless.org/sucks > Musl's useful not just for embedded systems but for older machines that > want to run efficient desktop environments. However, what works for a > desktop environment might not work well for an embedded system and so on. True, but small code wins everywhere, for it fits more easily in cache.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.