Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 23:30:47 -0500 From: Strake <strake888@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Thinking about release On 09/07/2013, Andre Renaud <andre@...ewatersys.com> wrote: > I wasn't too sure on memmove, but I've seen a reasonable amount of > code which just uses memmove as standard (rather than memcpy), to > avoid the possibility of overlapping regions. Not a great policy Why? What loss with memmove? That it takes 1.0125 times as long as memcpy, other than when memcpy might just trash the array or summon nasal demons anyhow?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.