Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:11:01 +1200 From: Andre Renaud <andre@...ewatersys.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: endian.h warnings Hi Rich, > I really don't understand why gcc is generating warnings for these; I > thought it automatically suppressed warnings for system include > directories, and even macro expansion text generated from macros > defined in these headers. If that suppression is not working > correctly, maybe we should work around these warnings. I agree it's > problematic for users to get spammed with irrelevant warnings that > decrease the signal to noise ratio of the compiler's warning > generation. You're right, this was caused because I wasn't correctly using the musl-gcc wrapper script, so gcc wasn't aware that they were system includes. Regards, Andre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.