Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 09:34:35 +0200 From: Jens Staal <staal1978@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: High-priority library replacements? On 2013-04-25 07:55, Kurt H Maier wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:15:53AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: >> >> 1. A light, C, UTF-8-only Unicode library. > > The only one I know of that might not already be common knowledge is > Connor Lane Smith's libutf: https://github.com/cls/libutf > > khm > Does it work as a drop-in replacement for unixy utf/wchar implementations or is it the Plan9 variant (reference to Runes implies the later)? I found myself needing at first libwchar from heirloom and later the (old) GNU libutf8 under APE to provide some wchar-related functions expected by various applications. It felt really silly to "devolve" like that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.