[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 09:34:35 +0200
From: Jens Staal <staal1978@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: High-priority library replacements?
On 2013-04-25 07:55, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:15:53AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
>>
>> 1. A light, C, UTF-8-only Unicode library.
>
> The only one I know of that might not already be common knowledge is
> Connor Lane Smith's libutf: https://github.com/cls/libutf
>
> khm
>
Does it work as a drop-in replacement for unixy utf/wchar
implementations or is it the Plan9 variant (reference to Runes implies
the later)? I found myself needing at first libwchar from heirloom and
later the (old) GNU libutf8 under APE to provide some wchar-related
functions expected by various applications.
It felt really silly to "devolve" like that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
