Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 09:54:47 -0400 From: Kurt H Maier <khm-lists@...ma.in> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: High-priority library replacements? On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:34:35AM +0200, Jens Staal wrote: > On 2013-04-25 07:55, Kurt H Maier wrote: > > Does it work as a drop-in replacement for unixy utf/wchar > implementations or is it the Plan9 variant (reference to Runes implies > the later)? I found myself needing at first libwchar from heirloom and > later the (old) GNU libutf8 under APE to provide some wchar-related > functions expected by various applications. > > It felt really silly to "devolve" like that. It's the Plan 9 variant -- wchar is a thing that needs to go away... maybe one day we can get there. :( khm
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.