Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:38:20 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Best place to discuss other lightweight libraries? On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 02:32:21PM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote: > 2013/4/24 Kurt H Maier <khm-lists@...ma.in>: > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 01:18:43PM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote: > >> > >> btw. has anyone used go with musl? > >> > > > > Go ships its own libc, which I'm fairly certain it depends on. > > lib9, but are you sure about that? > > # ldd /usr/bin/go > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff50fff000) > libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007ff215e4b000) > libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007ff215abf000) > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007ff216068000) Is the go binary written in go? The point was that go links programs against its own libc, not that the go compiler is linked against its own libc. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.