Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:28:48 +0200 From: John Spencer <maillist-musl@...fooze.de> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: go support (was: Best place to discuss other lightweight libraries?) On 04/24/2013 01:18 PM, Daniel Cegiełka wrote: > > btw. has anyone used go with musl? > i tried to build gcc 4.7.2 with go support (--enable-languages=c,c++,go) and that fails due to a lack of set/getcontext(). (see pkg/gcc472 in sabotage) according to rich, adding that to musl requires a non-trivial amount of arch specific asm. the go runtime in the gcc tree should be fixed to have a fallback when this functionality is missing (if possible), so it maybe be needed to ask on the go mailing list.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.