Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:28:48 +0200
From: John Spencer <>
Subject: Re: go support (was: Best place to discuss other lightweight libraries?)

On 04/24/2013 01:18 PM, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> btw. has anyone used go with musl?

i tried to build gcc 4.7.2 with go support (--enable-languages=c,c++,go)
and that fails due to a lack of set/getcontext().
(see pkg/gcc472 in sabotage)

according to rich, adding that to musl requires a non-trivial amount of 
arch specific asm.

the go runtime in the gcc tree should be fixed to have a fallback when 
this functionality is missing (if possible),
so it maybe be needed to ask on the go mailing list.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.