Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:07:26 -0500
From: Strake <>
Subject: Re: Best place to discuss other lightweight libraries?

On 22/04/2013, Rob Landley <> wrote:
> [Java] did dynamic memory management but _kept_ static
> typing, then realized how dumb taht was

So they realized that it's a damn good idea, but somehow made a crap
language nevertheless.

Haskell, for example, does dynamic memory allocation with static
types, and quite often wins.

> So back to the "new generation of system languages": C is a portable
> assembly language. It's a category killer in that niche, the best there
> is at what it does that's already killed off competitors like Pascal.

So on that note, I deem Haskell would be a categorical category killer (^_^)


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.