Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:07:26 -0500 From: Strake <strake888@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Best place to discuss other lightweight libraries? On 22/04/2013, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> wrote: > [Java] did dynamic memory management but _kept_ static > typing, then realized how dumb taht was So they realized that it's a damn good idea, but somehow made a crap language nevertheless. Haskell, for example, does dynamic memory allocation with static types, and quite often wins. > So back to the "new generation of system languages": C is a portable > assembly language. It's a category killer in that niche, the best there > is at what it does that's already killed off competitors like Pascal. So on that note, I deem Haskell would be a categorical category killer (^_^) Cheers, Strake
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.