[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130407162109.GU30576@port70.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 18:21:10 +0200
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Building libc separately from libm,librt,libpthread and
others
* Timerlan Moldobaev <moldobaev@...il.com> [2013-04-07 17:43:11 +0300]:
> Whereas the comparison table located in
> http://www.etalabs.net/compare_libcs.html
> claims the size of complete .a set as 333k, I got around 2M while building
> the library on x86_64 with gcc version 4.1.1.
btw the comparision was made on i386 and
32bit vs 64bit can make a big difference
i just checked here and libc.a is 1.4M but
the real size of the object code is 338K using
size libc.a |awk '{s+=$4}END{print s/1024}'
(i386, gcc 4.8)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
