Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:31:39 -0500 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: removed symbols in strings.h On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 09:25:47PM +0100, Jens Gustedt wrote: > Hello, > the functions > > int bcmp (const void *, const void *, size_t); > void bcopy (const void *, void *, size_t); > void bzero (void *, size_t); > char *index (const char *, int); > char *rindex (const char *, int); > > in strings.h are removed from the current version of the POSIX > standard. Shouldn't that mean they should be put between guards > (something with POSIX version and / or __GNU_SOURCE) Fixed. > and the symbols > made weak in the library? They're not referenced by anything else in the library and they're in their own translation units, so whether they're weak makes no difference. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.