Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:07:30 +0100 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com, pierre@...entlife.com Subject: Re: dladdr() * pierre <pierre@...entlife.com> [2013-01-22 07:27:46 +0100]: > The information I wanted you guys to have is that, > for the same application code, both GLIBC and musl > compiled in DEBUG mode do not crash (while musl in > release mode crashes). ... > at doing that - I was merely providing the information > I had available when you asked "does it work for you?". i'd assume you invoke ub somewhere (and i think that's what dalias was trying to say) but it is desirable to verify that this is really not a musl bug and we need better info for that: instead of 'debug mode' vs 'release mode' the config.mak with compiler flags/architecture/.. for the two cases instead of 'crash' the details of the caught signal, backtrace, memory map etc a link to the source code or a minimal example can help too i'm not sure how populating backtrace with dladdr works, sounds suspicious, how do you get your backtrace?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.