Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 06:52:06 -0600
From: Rob Landley <>
Subject: Re: malloc(0) behaviour

On 01/15/2013 02:31:24 AM, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> While the above is clear to me, returning a pointer that can't hold  
> anything just
> seems wrong to me.

Returning failure from an allocation that can't _not_ be satisfied  
seems wrong to me.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.